Lukas Klein vs Maxime Chazal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 May at 07:21 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Klein vs M. Chazal

SVK
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Klein 1 - 0 Chazal
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lukas Klein winning 2 and Maxime Chazal winning 0. The last match between Lukas Klein and Maxime Chazal was at the Prague Challenger, 09-05-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Lukas Klein getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Klein | 1 |
| Chazal | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Prague Challenger(05-09-25)
L. Klein vs M. Chazal H2H Profile
L. Klein vs M. Chazal Match Preview:
- Despite slight differences, Chazal edges out Klein in second serve win percentages, achieving a minor advantage with 43.59% compared to Klein's 42.83%. Does this small margin indicate Chazal's potential to outperform? It might, as second serve performance is a key predictor.
- In recent return games, Klein holds the upper hand on second serves, winning 51.85% of points against Chazal's 48.16%. Can this contribute to Klein controlling the rhythm of the match? The stats suggest it could.
- When it comes to returning first serves, Chazal has been more successful recently, capturing 29.05% compared to Klein's 24.66%. This might give Chazal a potential edge in breaking serve during the match.
- Facing breakpoints, Klein is slightly more resilient, saving 55.95% versus Chazal's 52.98%. Will this allow Klein to maintain composure under pressure? The statistics indicate it might.
- Chazal's yearly win rate is superior at 61.54% against Klein's 47.06%, suggesting greater overall performance. Could this hint at Chazal's potential higher confidence entering the match?
- Surface preferences reveal Chazal thrives on clay with a win rate of 63%, whereas Klein excels on hard courts with a 66% success rate. Both players struggle on I.hard courts, but Chazal's percentage is notably lower.
- Chazal predominantly competes in lower-tier tournaments, with a win rate of 71.11%, while Klein participates in higher-level Challengers and ITF events, achieving a 50% win rate. The difference in competition levels might impact match outcomes.
- Over the past year, Klein has faced tougher opponents, with an average ranking of 166.8 compared to Chazal's 393.68. Does this experience give Klein a competitive edge? Potentially, yes.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Chazal has a significant advantage, having won 60% of such sets, in contrast to Klein's 33%. This performance might give Chazal confidence in critical moments.
- In recent matches, Chazal has been more effective in converting breakpoints at 39.89%, whereas Klein lags behind at 31.53%. This could be pivotal during break opportunities in the upcoming match.
Editorial Prediction (May 9, 2025, UTC):
As we look toward the upcoming match, the statistics provide a comprehensive view of each player's strengths and weaknesses. Chazal boasts a slight edge in second serve points and breakpoint conversion, which are critical aspects that often determine match outcomes.
Klein's return game, particularly against second serves and their tougher opponent history, might offer a competitive challenge. However, Chazal's higher overall win rate coupled with superior performance in deciding sets may tip the scales in their favor.
Surface preferences indicate no significant advantage due to the common struggle on indoor hard courts. Still, Chazal's broader experience on various courts might play a role.
Taking all factors into account, Chazal appears more likely to secure victory in this matchup, leveraging slight advantages in key performance areas and overall match experience.
Lukas Klein vs Maxime Chazal Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Klein vs M. Chazal H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:11:35 | Average Match Time | 2:11:35 |
| 52% (43/83) | 1st Serve % | 74% (65/88) |
| 74% (32/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (32/65) |
| 33% (13/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 52% (46/88) | Return Points Win % | 46% (38/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Klein Recent Matches Played
M. Chazal Recent Matches Played

L. Klein vs M. Chazal Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.23% (357/226) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.29% (507/334) |
| 58.88% (809/565) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.10% (1115/804) |
| 53.46% (7163/6236) | Games Win/Loss | 53.53% (9542/8282) |
| 65.43% (106/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.48% (30/39) |
| 61.36% (162/102) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.87% (469/277) |
| 55.80% (77/61) | Indoor Hard W/L | 30.77% (8/18) |
| 63.16% (12/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 2659 | Aces Total | 1057 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1688 | Total Double Faults | 1473 |
| 1:29:32 | Average Match Time | 1:19:45 |
| 438.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 566.24 |
| 64% (24743/38454) | 1st Serve % | 68% (28327/41913) |
| 72% (17762/24743) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (18335/28327) |
| 51% (6975/13709) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (6630/13585) |
| 39% (1469/3791) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2200/4721) |
| 39% (15335/39486) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17613/40855) |
| 59.38% (19/13) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 14.29% (1/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.08% (25/23) | Main Tour W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 58.30% (151/108) | Challenger W/L | 42.50% (68/92) |
| 69.09% (152/68) | Futures W/L | 65.42% (437/231) |
| 62% (353/573) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (500/820) |
| 29% (2/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 51% (117/229) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (100/197) |
| 54% (108/199) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (151/254) |
| 87% (354/307) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (480/420) |
| 13% (354/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (480/58) |
| 22% (229/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (360/87) |